10 Aug 2023
Leave to appeal was refused because the applicant failed to identify any question of great general or public importance, the proposed appeal had no merits and no reasonable prospect of success, and there was procedural non-compliance with directions to file written submissions.
1 Nov 2021
The appeal is dismissed because the applicant failed to identify any error of law or omission by the judge in refusing leave; the Board's credibility and relocation findings were open to it, the alleged incident was not raised in the Form 86 and therefore could not be relied on, and family ties in Hong Kong do not constitute a non-refoulement ground; accordingly leave to apply for judicial review was correctly refused.
30 May 2018
Leave to apply for judicial review was refused because the applicants failed to identify any arguable error of law, unfairness or procedural irregularity; the Director and the Adjudicator gave reasons, engaged fairly with the applicants and reasonably concluded that internal relocation in India was available and that there was no realistic prospect of success on judicial review.