18 Apr 2007
SUMITRA JAYASENA KELLY v. CATHAY PACIFIC AIRWAYS LTD
- Citation
- SUMITRA JAYASENA KELLY v. CATHAY PACIFIC AIRWAYS LTD
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCMP2448/2006
Leave to appeal under s35A was rescinded because the required demonstration of a question of law of general public importance was not shown or even reasonably arguable; the identified issues were either questions of contractual construction or findings of inference not amounting to matters of general public importance and therefore the appeal would inevitably fail, justifying rescission of the previously granted leave with costs.