3 Nov 2016
WONG PIK HA v. 源發大廈業主立案法團
- Citation
- WONG PIK HA v. 源發大廈業主立案法團
- Court
- Lands Tribunal
- Case number
- LDBM193/2015
The application for leave to adduce expert evidence is refused because the disputed EMSD Request is a factual matter the expert cannot resolve, the safety objection rests on the IO's factual state of mind and must be supported by factual evidence rather than after‑the‑fact expert opinion, EMSD and CLP correspondence and guidance are the appropriate sources for proper procedures, and the IO sought expert evidence to gather support for its defence rather than to address a pleaded issue; therefore expert evidence is unnecessary, irrelevant and not probative.