15 Aug 2006
HKSAR v TSE HOI-PAN, DOMINIC
- Citation
- HKSAR v TSE HOI-PAN, DOMINIC
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCCC18/2006
The judge held that broad inquiry into complainant's prior sexual history was excluded by s.154 and its protective purpose, but limited cross-examination was permitted because the accused's defence directly contested penetration; questions confined to whether the complainant had ever had sexual intercourse before the alleged event, when she last had intercourse if relevant, and why she believed the accused penetrated and ejaculated, were sufficiently relevant that excluding them would be unfair to the accused.