14 Jun 2024
L v. R
- Citation
- [2024] HKCFI 1611
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCCT87/2023
The court refused to set aside the Service Out Order because L established a serious question to be tried: the Settlement Agreement is to be treated as an award under s66(2) for enforcement purposes and PO 7 amounted to a final termination of the arbitration with costs, there was no material non-disclosure and substituted service was justified; accordingly R's summons was dismissed and costs were awarded to L on an indemnity basis.