30 Jan 2026
香港特別行政區 訴 李超勇
- Citation
- [2026] HKCA 117
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- CACC267/2024
The application for out‑of‑time leave and for leave to appeal were refused because the proposed grounds were undeveloped, lacked affidavit evidence or particulars (notably the counsel‑incompetence allegation was abandoned and unsupported), the trial judge's evidential rulings were lawful and justified (including exclusion/non‑reliance on P7/P8 and acceptance of complainant), and there was no realistic prospect of success under the Chong Ching Yuen benchmark for serious incompetence or unfair trial.