29 Apr 2024
JWH v. TSM
- Citation
- [2024] HKCA 388
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- CAMP479/2022
Leave to appeal was refused because the proposed grounds were not reasonably arguable and the Judge's factual and discretionary conclusions fell within the generous ambit of reasonable disagreement; the proposed fresh evidence, though partly credible and post‑judgment, would not probably have an important influence on the outcome and therefore did not satisfy the Ladd v Marshall criteria for admission on a leave application; the Hadkinson order was refused as unnecessary to the outcome and would not have altered the decision on leave or fresh evidence.