26 Mar 2026
The court refused the application because the matters relied on were factual issues of witness credibility and factual findings about careless driving, not points of law of great and general importance nor arguable legal questions under s32(2); therefore no certificate could be issued.
25 Nov 2025
Leave to appeal was refused because the applicant did not identify any question of great general or public importance, failed to demonstrate any error in the Court of Appeal judgment or any viable ground of appeal, and the intended appeal had no reasonable prospect of success; no basis existed under the "otherwise" limb of s 22(1)(b).
16 Apr 2020
Leave to appeal to the Court of Final Appeal was refused because the applicant failed to demonstrate a question of great general or public importance under s22(1)(b) Cap 484, failed to provide sufficient particulars and reasonably arguable grounds, and no basis existed under the "otherwise" limb.
4 Oct 2019
Leave to appeal was refused because the applicant failed to identify any viable or reasonably arguable ground to reverse the judge's decision, failed to engage with the Court of Appeal's reasons, raised new fact‑sensitive points not previously argued, and did not meet the statutory threshold in s22(1)(b) of the Court of Final Appeal Ordinance (Cap 484).
15 Aug 2019
The notice of motion was dismissed because the applicant failed to identify any question of great general or public importance under section 22(1)(b) HKCFAO and there was no basis to grant leave under the alternative limb; therefore leave to appeal to the Court of Final Appeal was refused.