29 Jun 2022
香港特別行政區 訴 蔡浩民
- Citation
- [2022] HKCFI 1794
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCMA118/2021
The Court of First Instance dismissed the appeal because the magistrate had an evidential basis to accept (or at least not exclude) that the respondent lost his balance and reacted defensively; that factual finding underpinned the magistrate's conclusion that the reaction did not amount to self‑inviting suspicion, and the appellate court would not and could not properly disturb that discretionary costs decision absent clear error.