13 Jun 2017
侯錦榮 對 許淑珊及另一人
- Citation
- 侯錦榮 對 許淑珊及另一人
- Court
- District Court
- Case number
- DCCJ2788/2016
The court refused the out‑of‑time application for leave to appeal because the delay of about three months was excessive, the applicant failed to provide adequate evidential justification for the delay (no proof legal aid process caused delay), the appeal had little prospect of success as it merely re‑argued matters already decided by the Small Claims Tribunal and properly struck out under Order 18 r.19, and the delay prejudiced the defendants; accordingly leave was denied and costs were ordered against the applicant.