14 Jan 2003
F v. F
- Citation
- F v. F
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCMC4/2001
Court held it was bound by local authority C v C and therefore could not fully adopt White v White as overriding precedent, but applied the statutory s.7(1)/(2)/(3) factors to reach a fair outcome: A was not a child of the family for s.7(3) relief; marriage duration calculated from marriage to separation (4 years 3 months); wife entitled to a clean break package to meet lifetime needs given childcare responsibilities and health; used Duxbury capitalisation with an industry standard assumed real rate of return of 4.25% producing a HK$25 million capitalised annuity component; total awards to wi…