26 Sept 2025
張嘉雯 v. THE FOOTBALL ASSOCIATION OF HONG KONG, CHINA LTD
- Citation
- [2025] HKDC 1556
- Court
- District Court
- Case number
- DCEC1536/2023
The court refused the applicant's attempt to file the supplemental witness statement and disallowed the bulk of the 32 interrogatories because they were irrelevant, oppressive, amounted to cross-examination or were a fishing expedition; it granted respondent leave to adduce a single psychiatric expert because independent expert opinion was necessary and of probative value on diagnosis, causation, necessity and loss of earning capacity; costs follow the event with specified summary assessments and nisi orders.