18 Aug 2021
EGO FINANCE LTD v. JU LUI AND OTHERS
- Citation
- [2021] HKDC 1002
- Court
- District Court
- Case number
- DCMP1714/2020
The 1st defendant failed to discharge the burden required to set aside the summary judgment or to show a reasonable prospect of success under s63A; the unserved and late affirmations did not meet the criteria for admission as further evidence on appeal under O59 r10(2) and Ladd v Marshall; the 19 July summons did not establish any recognised legal basis to restrain possession or stay proceedings; accordingly both summonses were dismissed and costs awarded.