3 Jul 2003
THE INCORPORATED OWNERS OF REPULSE BAY TOWERS v. BOLTON CONSTRUCTION CO LTD
- Citation
- THE INCORPORATED OWNERS OF REPULSE BAY TOWERS v. BOLTON CONSTRUCTION CO LTD
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCCT105/2002
Leave to appeal was refused because the court found no strong prima facie case that the arbitrator was wrong: the arbitrator's construction of Article 3 was a reasonable interpretation, her findings on Clause 30(5)(a) and the validity of PAL's appointment were logical, and the determinative finding that time was rendered at large by contract-specific special provisions (SP/6E, SP/26F and the deletion of Clause 23(1)(f)) meant the arbitrator's overall conclusion was not appealable under the P.T. Dover scale and the presumption of finality.