10 Nov 2025
香港特別行政區 訴 吳禮聰
- Citation
- [2025] HKCFI 5267
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCCC121/2023
The court accepted the uncontested evidence of the applicant's previous counsel and contemporaneous signed meeting records showing the applicant was properly and repeatedly advised of the charges and the element that the goods were dangerous drugs; the applicant's later inconsistent allegations of believing the goods were dog food and of police coercion were not credible, amounted to fabrication, were raised belatedly, and therefore did not justify permitting withdrawal of the guilty plea.