22 Jan 2020
CENTALINE PROPERTY AGENCY LTD v. FENG ZHIFAN
- Citation
- [2020] HKCFI 261
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCSA43/2019
The application was refused because the matters advanced by the Defendant were factual disputes already considered and rejected by the Tribunal and did not raise any question of law under s.28; the specific refund argument failed because the Tribunal found the tenancy was terminated due to the Defendant's dishonoured cheque, so the refund entitlement did not apply.