15 Jan 2021
香港特別行政區 訴 劉俊鴻
- Citation
- [2021] HKCFI 101
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCMA64/2020
The motion for a certificate under s32 was dismissed because the challenged points were either fact‑bound or not of great and general importance: the police had effectively warned the applicant before the second interview so there was no unfairness or deprivation of right to consult counsel; consent was not a contested issue supported by evidence; and there was no breach of Browne v Dunn requiring appellate correction. Therefore no certificate was granted.