19 Sept 1997
HKSAR v. CHIU SIN HIM
- Citation
- HKSAR v. CHIU SIN HIM
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCMA16/1997
The appellant's recorded statements and admissions provided evidence from which the magistrate could properly conclude that he believed he was accepting the $18,000 as a reward for helping secure the lifeguard contract, thereby satisfying s.9(1)(a); accordingly the Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal and upheld the conviction.