8 Jun 2017
香港特別行政區 訴 黃繹維
- Citation
- 香港特別行政區 訴 黃繹維
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCMA319/2016
法院信納卧底警員的庭上證供,認為關鍵語句(尤其「我勝和」及相關表述)足以支持聲稱為三合會成員的控罪,並認為書面會面紀錄與庭上證供的若干差異屬次要且不足以令定罪不安穩;因此駁回上訴,維持原判及三個月監禁,並頒令上訴人負擔本次上訴訟費。
8 Jun 2017
法院信納卧底警員的庭上證供,認為關鍵語句(尤其「我勝和」及相關表述)足以支持聲稱為三合會成員的控罪,並認為書面會面紀錄與庭上證供的若干差異屬次要且不足以令定罪不安穩;因此駁回上訴,維持原判及三個月監禁,並頒令上訴人負擔本次上訴訟費。
5 Jul 1996
The trial judge carefully and properly evaluated the undercover officer's evidence, was entitled to accept it without corroboration, credibility findings could not be reassessed by this Court on the transcript alone, and the sentences imposed were neither wrong in principle nor manifestly excessive; therefore all applications for leave to appeal were dismissed.