29 Nov 2005
LAW CHUNG KI AND ANOTHER v. HKSAR
- Citation
- LAW CHUNG KI AND ANOTHER v. HKSAR
- Court
- Court of Final Appeal
- Case number
- FACC6/2005
Convictions were unsafe because prosecuting counsel improperly cross-examined the 1st accused on an antecedent statement, the trial judge gave incorrect directions on how to treat defence evidence and failed to give an appropriate cut-throat direction; those errors cumulatively required quashing the convictions and ordering retrial.