11 Mar 2019
MAK KAM CHIU v. 富明閣業主立案法團
- Citation
- [2019] HKLdT 11
- Court
- Lands Tribunal
- Case number
- LDBM204/2017
The court held there was no issue estoppel in respect of matters raised solely for the applicant's defence to the management fee claim, but there was issue estoppel in respect of the applicant's counterclaim because the Small Claims Tribunal had adjudicated and rejected the contention that the Assignment Plan governed the proper delineation; accordingly the Lands Tribunal application seeking the same relief was barred and struck out. Independently, even if issue estoppel did not apply, the application constituted a Henderson v Henderson abuse because the applicant failed to appeal, now seeks…