6 Jun 2018
香港特別行政區 訴 羅君豪及另二人
- Citation
- [2018] HKCFI 1213
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCMA615/2016
The appellate court upheld the convictions because the trial judge, who had the advantage of observing the undercover witness, conducted a careful, separate assessment of each count, properly applied Turnbull identification guidance, and reasonably accepted the witness as honest and reliable despite identified errors; the third appellant's appeal against refusal of costs was dismissed because late disclosure and provenance/authenticity concerns of D8 and resulting case-management prejudice rendered the judge's exercise of discretion reasonable and not subject to interference.