Hong Kong Case Law: Decisions & Judgments | LexChat

Hong Kong Case Law

Evidence (radar and vdr)
  • 16 May 2013

    KULEMESIN YURIY AND ANOTHER v. HKSAR

    Citation
    KULEMESIN YURIY AND ANOTHER v. HKSAR
    Court
    Court of Final Appeal
    Case number
    FACC7/2012

    2nd Appellant was awarded costs here and below including the trial because there were no positive reasons to deny costs: the early statements were of little weight, contemporaneous objective evidence (VTS radar, voice data recorder, video) meant his conduct did not mislead the prosecution, and the Court of Appeal should not have deprived him of costs; certificates for two counsel were granted.