3 Sept 2004
LINFIELD LTD v. TAOHO DESIGN ARCHITECTS LTD AND OTHERS
- Citation
- LINFIELD LTD v. TAOHO DESIGN ARCHITECTS LTD AND OTHERS
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCCT68/2001
Court found MML breached express contractual warranty and duty in selecting and installing Poiseul B5 and is liable for remedial costs and foreseeable loss of rental; GWA as RSE did not breach duties because it reasonably relied on MML's specialised data, acted within statutory supervisory scope, was not required to perform exhaustive pre‑construction testing, and causation of wider economic loss was not attributable to GWA; assignment to Linfield valid; contribution claims dismissed.