21 May 2025
HKSAR v. LAM KIT WAI AND OTHERS
- Citation
- [2025] HKCA 429
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- CACC107/2021
Leave refused because the judge reasonably concluded, on the totality of circumstantial evidence (large‑scale structured transfers, use of remittance agents and cashier orders, spreading into multiple HKJC accounts, expert opinion on indicia of laundering and absence of credible documentary explanation), that the only irresistible inference was that the defendants had reasonable grounds to believe the monies were tainted and the defence explanations did not displace that inference.