14 Jul 2020
PRAJNA SANTI BUDHIMULJA v. SHINHAN BANK
- Citation
- [2020] HKDC 542
- Court
- District Court
- Case number
- DCCJ348/2019
The court stayed all further conduct of the District Court action, including the interpleader summons, because the substantive dispute over beneficial ownership of the time deposit is more appropriately managed and decided in the Family Court under the MPPO which has no comparable monetary limit, and because the Claimant intends to challenge the Family Court's jurisdiction such that resolution of that challenge should determine the proper disposition of this action.