1 Apr 2025
香港特別行政區 訴 丞美服務有限公司
- Citation
- [2025] HKCFI 2614
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCMA504/2024
Appellant failed to prove, on the civil standard required by s16A(1), that it did not receive the notice and that any non-receipt was not due to its negligence: company had moved address with sufficient time to update records, had prior incidents of lost mail and took no reasonable steps to prevent or investigate missing mail; magistrate's factual findings were justified and appellate court, on re-hearing, found no error, therefore appeal dismissed.