31 May 2016
MA CHI HUNG v. BACCARAT FAR EAST LTD
- Citation
- MA CHI HUNG v. BACCARAT FAR EAST LTD
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCLA7/2016
The email exchanges did not constitute a binding variation of the written employment contract because no acceptance occurred; the employer's Email 3 constituted a final package proposal that could not be severed by the employee; the Presiding Officer's factual findings (including credibility and that discussions were deferred pending management changes) were not shown to be erroneous in law or outside jurisdiction; consequently the application for leave to appeal failed.