3 Jun 2005
HKSAR v. CHANG CHI LUNG
- Citation
- HKSAR v. CHANG CHI LUNG
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCMA328/2005
The magistrate's finding that the appellant intentionally struck the officer was properly based on contemporaneous eyewitness testimony describing three quick successive blows, the officer's testimony about being stunned and receiving forceful blows, the accompanying foul language, and medical evidence of redness; discrepancies were minor and did not render the conviction unsafe, so the appeal was dismissed.