Hong Kong Case Law: Decisions & Judgments | LexChat

Topic

Incentive payment

Legal area

Court

30 Mar 2022

LAU TIN CHEUNG v. IBM CHINA/HONG KONG LTD

Citation

[2022] HKCFI 897
Court

Court of First Instance
Case number

HCLA15/2021

Leave to appeal was granted because IBM demonstrated reasonably arguable grounds that the DPO may have placed undue weight on the 7 March 2018 email and the 31 January 2018 TAAP statement without holistically investigating all relevant TAAP decks, computer records and historic transactions, thereby raising an arguable point of law/jurisdiction under s32 LTO.
27 Apr 2007

CHEER GIANT INTERNATIONAL LTD v. WO MING ENGINEERING LTD

Citation

CHEER GIANT INTERNATIONAL LTD v. WO MING ENGINEERING LTD
Court

District Court
Case number

DCCJ4872/2006

Defendant's account was found inherently incredible and contradicted documentary evidence; parol evidence and non est factum defences failed; there was no triable issue and the Plaintiff was entitled to summary judgment for HK$202,500 with interest and the Defendant's counter-claim was struck out.