29 May 2000
NG SIU KEI v. CHONG MEE MEE
- Citation
- NG SIU KEI v. CHONG MEE MEE
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCA5292/1998
The plaintiff took the cheque unconditionally because there was no evidence the condition (if any) was communicated to him; Connie was acting as agent for the defendant in relation to the cheque, so the defendant's instruction did not bind the plaintiff; therefore the defendant is liable to pay the dishonoured cheque.