Hong Kong Case Law: Decisions & Judgments | LexChat

Hong Kong Case Law

Invoice authenticity

  • 27 Nov 2015

    YUI CHUNG YIN v. NG KIT SUM

    Citation
    YUI CHUNG YIN v. NG KIT SUM
    Court
    Court of Appeal
    Case number
    CACV25/2013

    The appeal is dismissed because the Court was not satisfied the trial judge was plainly wrong on the central factual finding that prices were those in the I_MY invoices, the Jack invoices were peripheral and unsupported as fabricated evidence, and the Plaintiff could not rely on new grounds not in the Notice of Appeal without leave which was not granted; therefore the trial judgment in favour of the Defendant stands.

  • 5 May 2010

    KEYMARK TEXTILES LTD v. MANWAY TEXTILES CO LTD

    Citation
    KEYMARK TEXTILES LTD v. MANWAY TEXTILES CO LTD
    Court
    Court of First Instance
    Case number
    HCA1610/2007

    No express term was proved by either party as to application of the 12% maximum weaving loss. However, an implied term was necessary and obvious to give business efficacy: the 12% maximum weaving loss is to be applied and calculated by reference to each individual sizing batch. On that basis Keymark proved a shortfall of 176,095.45 yards and damages of HK$801,041.73. Manway proved the 14th invoice for HK$408,000. After set-off Keymark owed Manway HK$342,563.59; interest and costs orders follow.