12 Mar 2026
The appeal is dismissed because the applicant failed to identify with sufficient particularity any error of law, procedural unfairness or irrationality in the Leave Decision; general, unsupported assertions about risk and procedural deficiencies do not justify overturning a refusal of leave to apply for judicial review.
5 Feb 2026
The appeal is dismissed because the applicant failed to identify any error in the Judge's refusal of leave with sufficient particulars and relied on bare, unsupported assertions; under Nupur Mst the Court of Appeal will not re‑examine the merits of the Board's decision absent viable grounds to reverse the judge's decision.
31 Oct 2022
The appeal is dismissed because the appellant failed to identify any legal or factual error in the summary assessment amounts; the assessment was correctly conducted on the basis of the prior costs liability order and the appellant's attempt to re‑argue the underlying strike‑out and summary judgment decisions does not amount to a challenge to the assessment itself.
7 Jan 2022
Appeal dismissed because the applicant introduced new grounds on appeal that were not raised in the timely leave application below and the Court will not entertain fact-sensitive new grounds; additionally the applicant failed to identify with sufficient particularity any legal error by the Deputy Judge or a reasonable prospect of success, and his delay was unexplained such that relief was not warranted.
27 Nov 2015
The appeal is dismissed because the Court was not satisfied the trial judge was plainly wrong on the central factual finding that prices were those in the I_MY invoices, the Jack invoices were peripheral and unsupported as fabricated evidence, and the Plaintiff could not rely on new grounds not in the Notice of Appeal without leave which was not granted; therefore the trial judgment in favour of the Defendant stands.