5 Jul 2024
香港特別行政區 訴 鄒幸彤
- Citation
- [2024] HKCFI 1735
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCCC155/2022
Considering the distinct nature of the offences, the limited scope of disclosed PII material, the magistrate's and appellate judge's public reasons about redactions and relevance, and the absence of factual overlap or evidence that unredacted PII formed part of the prosecution case, a fair‑minded and informed observer would not conclude there was a real possibility of apparent (including subconscious) bias; the recusal application is therefore dismissed.