7 May 2020
香港特別行政區 訴 梁耀宗
- Citation
- [2020] HKCFI 374
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCMA265/2019
The appeal on conviction is allowed in part because latent anomalies in the police custody/notification document (P4) created doubt sufficient to undermine the prosecution case on count 1 (knowingly misleading a police officer), leading to quashing of that conviction and vacation of its sentence. The conviction for count 2 (possession of another's identity card) is upheld because possession was established and the appellant failed to discharge his evidential burden of reasonable excuse. The original aggregate sentence for count 2 was reduced from 22 months 15 days to 18 months, to run consecu…