2 Mar 2011
TELINGS INTERNATIONAL HONG KONG LTD v. JOHN HO AND OTHERS
- Citation
- TELINGS INTERNATIONAL HONG KONG LTD v. JOHN HO AND OTHERS
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- CACV10/2010
Leave to appeal was refused because the guarantee was not clearly a liquidated claim — clause 8.01 combined a performance (damages) guarantee with an obligation to pay, creating uncertainty unsuitable for determination on a leave application under s22(1)(a); the defendants' extension of time was refused because the delay (change of advisers' view) was insufficient justification and no question of great and general importance was shown.