20 Oct 1997
LAM WING MAN, FANNY v. HARBOUR CHEER LIMITED
- Citation
- LAM WING MAN, FANNY v. HARBOUR CHEER LIMITED
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCAL83/1997
Leave to appeal under s.23(2) was refused because the applicant’s eight‑month delay in applying was unreasonable and, independently, there was no real prospect of success: privity was established by the assignment and clause 6 of the Management Agreement together with clause 17 of the Deed empowered the manager to arbitrate; applicant’s other allegations were not raised at arbitration and did not demonstrate merit.