19 Jan 1989
No good reasons were demonstrated to justify allowing the appeal out of time; awaiting the outcome of the conviction appeal and reliance on a non-comparable prior sentence did not excuse the delay, therefore leave was refused.
23 Apr 1986
The Court held that notwithstanding some inconsistencies, the complainant's evidence was sufficiently reliable to support the blackmail convictions; evidence including Lai Ka Wing's testimony and the 4th Defendant's conduct sufficiently established his membership of and role assisting management in the triad branch; and the Training Centre Order was an appropriate rehabilitation-focused sentence for the juvenile given his background and the nature of the offences, therefore the appeals were dismissed.