23 Mar 2022
香港特別行政區 訴 袁格詩
- Citation
- [2022] HKCFI 727
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCMA44/2021
The High Court held the conviction was safe because the trial judge's acceptance of prosecution witnesses and CCTV evidence, together with the appellant's own statement, were supported by the record and not perverse; the appellant's claim of forgetfulness due to mental disorder lacked expert evidence and was insufficient to rebut intent. However, because the appellant had been remanded for over three months, the fine imposed was inappropriate; the Court substituted the fine with a three‑day custodial sentence, to be fully credited against time already served on remand.