9 Jan 2019
BRIGHT GOLD LTD v. MEGA WELL DEVELOPMENT LTD
- Citation
- [2019] HKCFI 54
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCA2194/2011
The court found that Centaline, via its agent Wong, repeatedly misrepresented the extent of the roof forming part of Duplex B and that Mega Well relied on that misrepresentation; Centaline acted as agent of Bright Gold for marketing and communicating roof information so Bright Gold is vicariously liable; Mega Well is entitled to rescind the PSPA and SPA and to damages in lieu (HK$3,050,000) as alternative; WKLL did not breach their duty of care and Mega Well's counterclaim against WKLL was dismissed.