13 Jan 2009
HKSAR v. HE JIA JIN
- Citation
- HKSAR v. HE JIA JIN
- Court
- Court of Final Appeal
- Case number
- FAMC61/2008
Leave to appeal refused because, despite the trial judge's mistaken reference to a phone call, the evidence taken as a whole (empty prior account, applicant's instruction for remittance, his presentation of identity and a purported higher value instruction, and his conduct) amply established knowledge of the mistaken overpayment and dishonest appropriation such that there was no substantial and grave injustice and the proviso could be applied to uphold the conviction.