8 Oct 2024
The application for leave to appeal was dismissed because the applicant's allegations were general, unsupported by particulars, and fact-specific; new complaints raised had not been presented below and could not form the basis for leave; the matters did not raise any question of great general or public importance under s22(1)(b) HKCFAO and no 'or otherwise' basis justified leave.
20 Dec 2019
Leave to appeal was refused because the applicant failed to identify any error in the Court of Appeal Judgment; the grounds were unmeritorious and fact‑sensitive matters properly within the Board/Director's province; the matters did not raise questions of great general or public importance under s22(1)(b).
27 Jun 2019
Leave to appeal was refused because the applicant failed to identify a question of great general or public importance under s22(1)(b) Cap 484, advanced new fact‑sensitive points not argued below, and there was no basis under the 'otherwise' limb; accordingly the Notice of Motion was dismissed.
15 Apr 2019
Leave to appeal was refused because the applicant's grounds were confined to case-specific facts and did not raise questions of great general or public importance under s.22(1)(b); most grounds were new and not raised in the appeal below and are not a basis for leave; the state acquiescence ground was unarguable; no basis under the "otherwise" limb was shown; statutory threshold for leave not satisfied.