2 Apr 1948
LO MON HUNG AND OTHERS v. NAM YAN INVESTMENT CO
- Citation
- LO MON HUNG AND OTHERS v. NAM YAN INVESTMENT CO
- Court
- District Court
- Case number
- DCMP6/1948
The appeal is allowed because the Tribunal improperly ruled that no tenancies existed by resolving credibility at the close of the appellants' case without requiring the respondents to elect to call no evidence; the proper practice requires an election or the opportunity to call evidence before a judge or tribunal determines credibility and dismisses a case, therefore the hearing was unsatisfactory and a de novo hearing is required.