21 Mar 2025
律政司司長 訴 羅健熙
- Citation
- [2025] HKCA 294
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- CACC217/2022
The Court of Appeal dismissed the prosecution's case‑stated appeal and upheld the acquittal of D6 because, although the trial judge's exposition of authority was imperfect, the acquittal relied on permissible factual findings and was not perverse; the court refused leave and dismissed D10's appeal because the prosecution proved beyond reasonable doubt that the laser pointer and multitool were possessed with intent to be used as offensive weapons given the circumstances and inferences available to the trial judge.