13 Apr 2018
香港特別行政區 訴 劉承聰
- Citation
- [2018] HKCFI 751
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCMA278/2017
The appeal succeeds because the circumstantial evidence did not exclude reasonable doubt as to the appellant’s dishonest intent; the trial judge’s adverse credibility inference was not the only rational conclusion from the evidence and the conviction was therefore unsafe and quashed.