2 Dec 2025
The application for leave to appeal was dismissed because the applicants did not identify any question of great general or public importance under s.22(1)(b), their submissions related only to personal circumstances and failed to show any error in the Court of Appeal's decision, and there was no alternative basis to grant leave.
20 Nov 2024
The proposed grounds merely repeat allegations previously rejected by this court and do not raise any reasonably arguable question of great general or public importance under s22(1)(b) Cap.484; accordingly leave to appeal to the Court of Final Appeal is refused and the Notice of Motion is dismissed, with costs to the putative respondent.
22 Aug 2024
The applicant failed to satisfy the statutory threshold for leave to appeal because he did not demonstrate that the intended appeal raised a matter of great general or public importance nor show any real prospects of success; accordingly leave was refused and the Notice of Motion dismissed.
7 Aug 2024
The Court dismissed the application for leave to appeal because the applicant failed to identify any question of great general or public importance under s22(1)(b) Cap.484 and there was no basis under the 'or otherwise' limb; the application was insufficient and procedurally non‑compliant.
10 Nov 2022
Leave to appeal was refused because the applicant failed to show any question of great general or public importance under section 22(1)(b) Cap 484 and failed to demonstrate any prospects of success in the intended appeal; determination on paper without oral hearing was appropriate.