30 Aug 2002
HKSAR v. YIP CHI FUN AND ANOTHER
- Citation
- HKSAR v. YIP CHI FUN AND ANOTHER
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- CACC234/2001
D1: omission in the summing‑up about possible significance of limited matters was not material because D1 actually signed key documents and there was no evidence he did not see them; leave to appeal refused. D2: judge materially omitted to direct the jury on the relevance of good character; leave to appeal granted out of time but, applying the proviso (s83(1) CPO), the omission did not cause miscarriage of justice because the evidence of guilt was overwhelming; appeal dismissed and conviction upheld.