9 Aug 1996
R. v. CH\'NG POH
- Citation
- R. v. CH\'NG POH
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- CACC223/1993
The court held that, relying on s.72(2) CPO and the court's equitable jurisdiction to grant freezing relief in aid of execution, it was entitled to restrain the defendant from withdrawing the recognisance and accrued interest until the prosecution's order for costs had been taxed because there was evidence of steps to frustrate enforcement, prior Mareva findings supporting risk of dissipation, and the order preserved assets for all creditors rather than conferring Crown priority.