17 Jul 2001
MASS MUTURAL ASIA LTD. v. LAM KING MUI
- Citation
- MASS MUTURAL ASIA LTD. v. LAM KING MUI
- Court
- District Court
- Case number
- DCCJ16002/2000
Court found on the evidence that Defendant solicited the Plaintiffs agents, justifying termination; the written Memo unambiguously made Special Income repayable on termination or joining another insurer and the alleged oral variation did not alter repayment clauses, therefore Plaintiff was entitled to recover HK$386,868.00; Special Bonus was earned and not repayable because repayment was not provided for in the Memo or Letter and conduct of accounts showed the bonus was written off as earned.