9 Feb 2007
SIEGFRIED ADALBERT UNRUH v. HANS-JOERG SEEBERGER AND ANOTHER
- Citation
- SIEGFRIED ADALBERT UNRUH v. HANS-JOERG SEEBERGER AND ANOTHER
- Court
- Court of Final Appeal
- Case number
- FACV9/2006
Clause 5 of the MoA, read in its commercial context, makes Mr Seeberger personally liable to pay the Special Bonus if Egana does not pay within 28 days of ESCT receiving monetary compensation exceeding US$10 million (failure to pay for any reason triggers the proviso); the MoA covers the arbitration and related proceedings so the global settlement fell within its scope; the best endeavours clause is not a condition precedent to bonus entitlement; the MoA is not champertous given respondent's genuine commercial interest and public policy considerations; however, there was insufficient evidence…